Review of Active Control of Flow-induced Cavity Resonance
Skip Nav Destination
Technical Briefs
Passive Control of Transonic Cavity Period
Diane South. Doran
Section of Aerospace Sciences,
Cranfield University
, Wharley Finish, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK
Search for other works past this writer on:
Diane S. Doran
Section of Aerospace Sciences,
Cranfield University
, Wharley End, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, U.k.
J. Fluids Eng. Jun 2008, 130(six): 064501 (four pages)
Published Online: May 19, 2008
Abstract
Open up cavities at transonic speeds can result in acoustic resonant flow behavior with fluctuating pressure level levels of sufficient intensity to cause significant damage to internal stores and surrounding structures. Extensive inquiry in this field has produced numerous cavity catamenia control techniques, the more than effective of which may require costly feedback control systems or entail other drawbacks such equally drag penalties or rapid functioning degradation at off-design condition. The current study focuses on the utilise of uncomplicated geometric modifications of a rectangular planform crenel with the aim of attenuating the aeroacoustic signature. Experiments were performed in an intermittent suck-downward transonic wind tunnel by using a typical open flow rectangular planform crenel, which was modularly designed such that the leading and trailing edge geometries could be modified past using a family unit of inserts. The electric current work focused on a variety of recessed leading border stride arrangements. Configurations were tested at transonic Mach numbers spanning the range Mach 0.seven–0.9, and unsteady pressure measurements were recorded at diverse stations inside the crenel in order to obtain acoustic spectra. The virtually constructive configuration at Mach 0.9 was the leading edge footstep employing a step tiptop to pace length ratio of 0.4. This configuration achieved a tonal attenuation of up to and an overall sound pressure level (OASPL) reduction of approximately . This is a pregnant level of racket suppression in comparing with other passive control methods. In addition, it offers the additional benefits of beingness a simple geometric feature, which does not rely on placing flow effectors into the high-speed grazing flow.
1.
ESDU
, 2005, "
Aerodynamics and Aero-Acoustics of Rectangular Planform Cavities, Role I: Time-Averaged Flow
," Datasheet 02008.
two.
Heller H. Delfs J.
Cavity Pressure level Oscillations: The Generating Mechanism Visualised
,"
J. Audio Vib.
0022-460X,
196
(
ii
), pp.
248
–
252
.
3.
Vakili A. Gauthier C.
Command of Cavity Flow by Upstream Mass-Injection
,"
J. Aircr.
0021-8669,
31
(
1
), pp.
169
–
174
.
four.
McGrath Southward. Shaw Fifty.
Agile Control of Shallow Crenel Acoustic Resonance
," AIAA Paper No. 96-1949.
5.
Cattafesta L. Williams D. Rowley C. Alvi F.
Review of Active Control of Flow-Induced Crenel Resonance
," AIAA Paper No. 2003-3567.
6.
Ukeiley Fifty. Ponton M. Seiner J. Jansen B.
Suppression of Pressure Loads in Resonating Cavities Through Blowing
," AIAA Newspaper No. 2003-0181.
7.
Sarno R. Franke 1000.
Suppression of Flow-Induced Pressure Oscillations in Cavities
,"
J. Aircr.
0021-8669,
31
(
1
), pp.
90
–
96
.
eight.
Cabell R. Kegerise M. Cox D. Gibbs Chiliad.
Experimental Feedback Command of Flow Induced Cavity Tones
," AIAA Paper No. 2002-2497.
9.
Stanek K. Raman Thousand. Kibens V. Ross J. Odedra J. Peto J.
Control of Cavity Resonance Through Very Loftier Frequency Forcing
," AIAA Paper No. 2000-1905.
10.
Smith B. Welterten T. Maines B. Shaw 50. Stanek One thousand. Grove J.
Weapons Bay Acoustic Suppression From Rod Spoilers
," AIAA Paper No. 2002-0662.
xi.
Rockwell D. Naudascher E.
Review—Self-Sustaining Oscillations of Flow By Cavities
,"
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
100
(
2
), pp.
152
–
165
.
12.
Sarohia Five. Massier P.
Control of Cavity Noise
,"
J. Aircr.
0021-8669,
fourteen
(
v
), pp.
833
–
837
.
13.
Charwat A. Roos J. Dewey C. Hiltz J.
An Investigation of Separated Flows—Part 2 Flow in the Cavity and Heat Transfer
,"
J. Aerosp. Sci.
0095-9820,
28
(
half-dozen
), pp.
457
–
470
.
xiv.
Rossiter J.
Wind-Tunnel Experiments on the Flow Over Rectangular Cavities at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds
," RAE Technical Study No. 64037.
15.
Heller H. Holmes D. Covert Eastward.
Flow Induced Pressure Oscillations in Shallow Cavities
,"
J. Sound Vib.
0022-460X,
xviii
(
4
), pp.
545
–
553
.
16.
Bilanin A. Covert East.
Estimation of Possible Excitation Frequencies for Shallow Rectangular Cavities
,"
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
eleven
(
iii
), pp.
347
–
351
.
17.
Heller H. Bliss D.
The Concrete Mechanism of Menses-Induced Pressure level Fluctuations in Cavities and Concepts for Their Suppression
," AIAA Paper No. 75-491.
18.
Plentovich E. Stallings R. Tracy Chiliad.
Experimental Cavity Pressure Measurements at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds
," NASA Technical Paper No. 3358.
nineteen.
Zhang J. Morishita E. Okunuki T. Itoh H.
Experimental and Computational Investigation of Supersonic Cavity Flows
," AIAA Paper No. 87–0166.
20.
Tracy M. Plentovich East.
Cavity Unsteady-Pressure Measurements at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds
," NASA Technical Paper No. 3669.
21.
Komerath N. Ahuja K. Chambers F.
Prediction and Measurement of Menses Over Cavities—A Survey
," AIAA Paper No. 87-0166.
22.
Ukeiley L. Ponton Thou. Seiner J. Jansen B.
Suppression of Pressure Loads in Resonating Cavities Through Blowing
," AIAA Paper No. 2002-0661.
Copyright © 2008
by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign In
Purchase this Content
Source: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/fluidsengineering/article/130/6/064501/466783/Passive-Control-of-Transonic-Cavity-Flow